Ammit is a five-reel mythology slot from Wishbone with a 96.02% RTP. It ranks in the 93.8th percentile by popularity across the corpus, but sits 0.20 percentage points below its own provider’s average. If you want a game that draws on Egyptian and mythological themes without chasing a headline number, this is a reasonable pick. If you want every basis point of return, look at the alternatives below.
Who makes Ammit
Wishbone publishes Ammit as part of a catalogue of 23 slot titles. That is a small portfolio compared to providers with hundreds of games, so each release tends to carry more weight in the company’s overall output. The provider’s catalogue-wide average RTP is 96.22%, which means Ammit trails its own stable by a modest margin.
Wishbone is not one of the largest suppliers in the market, and detailed developer profiles are sparse in public databases. What the numbers do tell you is that across its 23 titles, the studio clusters RTP values in a narrow band close to 96.2%—Ammit, Kingfisher of the Sands, Hermes Bonanza, and Blazing Lake Link & Win all land within 0.23 percentage points of each other. That consistency suggests a deliberate house strategy rather than game-by-game tuning.
The game carries the labels Mythology and Egypt, with a secondary tag of Gods, all pointing to a theme rooted in ancient Egyptian belief. Ammit—the creature from funerary texts that consumes the hearts of the unjust—fits squarely in that tradition.
Where Ammit sits in the Wishbone catalogue
Three titles in the related-providers list illustrate how tight Wishbone’s RTP distribution is. Hermes Bonanza returns exactly 96.22%, matching the provider average to the basis point. Kingfisher of the Sands edges up to 96.24%, while Blazing Lake Link & Win sits at 96.21%. Ammit at 96.02% is the lowest of these four.
In practical terms, a 0.20% RTP gap is small enough that short-session variance dwarfs it. Across 10,000 spins at a £1 stake, the expected difference between Ammit and Kingfisher of the Sands is £20. You would not notice that in a single evening’s play. Over tens of thousands of spins it compounds, but almost no real-money session lasts that long.
What does separate these games is the volatility profile—when published—which you will read about in the next section.
RTP: 96.02% against a 96.22% house average
Return to player is a long-run statistical average. At 96.02% RTP, the game is expected to return £96.02 for every £100 wagered across a very large sample—typically tens of millions of spins. Your individual session can land far above or far below that figure because short-term results are governed by variance, not RTP.
Ammit’s 96.02% sits 0.31 percentage points above the corpus average of 95.71%, which places it in a slightly better-than-average position against all slots in this review set. Against Wishbone’s own average of 96.22%, however, it underperforms by 0.20 points. The table below summarises the key figures that are published.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTP | 96.02% |
| Reels | 5 |
| Themes | Mythology, Egypt, Gods |
| Popularity percentile | 93.8% |
| Free demo | Available |
| Volatility | Not published |
| Max win | Not published |
| Stake range | Not published |
| Hit frequency | Not published |
Several fields are empty because Wishbone has not released them for this title. Treat any third-party number you see quoted for those values with caution.
Volatility and who it suits
Wishbone has not published a volatility rating for Ammit, which is a genuine gap in the information available to you as a player. Without that figure, you cannot confidently predict whether your bankroll will face frequent small swings or infrequent large ones.
In general terms, low-volatility slots pay smaller wins more often, which stretches a fixed budget over more spins. High-volatility slots pay less frequently but with larger potential payouts, meaning longer dry spells punctuated by occasional spikes. Medium volatility sits between the two. A 96.02% RTP tells you the total expected return but says nothing about how that return is distributed across individual spins.
The five-reel layout suggests a conventional payline or ways structure, but without published hit-frequency data you cannot confirm how often you can expect a winning combination. If you find volatility information elsewhere, check whether the source cites Wishbone directly or simply estimates it from observation.
Playing Ammit for free
The Ammit free demo is available on this site, running the same paytable and random-number logic as the real-money version. You can spin without registering or depositing, which lets you assess the pacing and feature design at no cost. Note that demo play does not predict real-money outcomes—each spin is independent, and short bursts of good or bad luck in demo carry no statistical meaning for future sessions.
Wishbone has not published a stake range for Ammit, so you cannot pre-calculate how many spins a given budget will cover. A useful general rule: divide your session bankroll by your intended per-spin stake to get an approximate spin count, then assume that number will vary by 20-30% in either direction due to random distribution.
Slots are a form of paid entertainment. If you decide to play for real money, set a budget before you start, treat any money spent as the cost of that entertainment, and stop when the budget is gone. If gambling stops feeling like entertainment, contact a helpline.
Similar picks
If you enjoy the mythology label specifically, Gates of Olympus offers 96.5% RTP—0.48 percentage points above Ammit—and draws on Greek rather than Egyptian gods. Its popularity is substantially higher, so you will find more community discussion around its feature behaviour.
At the other end of the range, 9 Arrows of Odysseus sits at 94.0% RTP, well below both Ammit and the corpus average. If you are comparing mythology slots purely on return, Ammit’s 96.02% is clearly ahead of that option. The single-reel Demi Gods 7 at 95.42% is another lower-RTP alternative within the same theme group of 801 titles.
Verdict
Ammit is a competent mid-pack slot from a small provider that keeps its RTP values tightly clustered. Its 96.02% return is above the corpus average but below Wishbone’s own house figure, and the absence of published volatility, max-win, and hit-frequency data means you are making a partly blind choice. The mythology and Egypt theming is well-established in the catalogue’s 801-title theme pool, so if that aesthetic appeals, Ammit gives you a five-reel format at a reasonable return. Set your budget, spin the demo first, and do not expect any pattern in short-session results.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I play Ammit for free without downloading anything?
The Ammit free demo is available directly in your browser with no registration or deposit required. It uses the same 96.02% RTP paytable as the real-money version, so you can evaluate pacing and feature design at zero cost before deciding whether to wager real funds.
What is the RTP of the Ammit slot and how does it compare to Wishbone's average?
Ammit returns 96.02% over a long statistical sample, which is 0.20 percentage points below Wishbone's catalogue average of 96.22%. Across 100,000 spins at a £1 stake, that gap amounts to roughly £20 in expected difference—negligible in any realistic session but relevant over extended play.
Is Ammit a high or low volatility slot?
Wishbone has not published a volatility rating for Ammit, so no reliable figure is available. Without that data you cannot determine whether wins will cluster in frequent small amounts or arrive rarely in larger spikes. Treat any third-party volatility claim for this title as an unverified estimate.
How does Ammit compare to Gates of Olympus?
Gates of Olympus returns 96.5% RTP versus Ammit's 96.02%, a gap of 0.48 percentage points. Both draw on mythology themes, but Gates of Olympus references Greek gods while Ammit centres on Egyptian funerary imagery. Gates of Olympus also carries significantly higher search and play volume.
Who is Wishbone and how many games do they make?
Wishbone is a slot provider with 23 titles in the reviewed catalogue. The studio clusters its RTP values tightly around 96.2%, with individual games ranging from 96.02% (Ammit) to 96.24% (Kingfisher of the Sands). Ammit ranks at position 1229 overall with a popularity percentile of 93.8%.
